America’s “worst enemy”
Posted: September 28, 2011 Filed under: Imperial Power, War on Terror, World Hegemony, World War III | Tags: China, Drone Attacks, Haqqani Network, Military Industrial Complex, Neocons, Pakistan, Russia Leave a commentThe Latest Orchestrated Threat and The End of History
by Paul Craig Roberts
Published: Sep. 27, 2011 – Information Clearing House
Have you ever before heard of the Haqqanis? I didn’t think so. Like Al Qaeda, about which no one had ever heard prior to 9/11, the “Haqqani Network” has popped up in time of need to justify America’s next war–Pakistan.
President Obama’s claim that he had Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden exterminated deflated the threat from that long-serving bogyman. A terror organization that left its leader, unarmed and undefended, a sitting duck for assassination no longer seemed formidable. Time for a new, more threatening, bogyman, the pursuit of which will keep the “war on terror” going.
FedEx and Pepsi Are Top Defense Contractors? 5 Corporate Brands Making a Killing on America’s Wars
Posted: September 11, 2011 Filed under: War on Terror | Tags: Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, Pentagon, US Military Spending 1 CommentLearn which “civilian” companies are making big bucks on today’s wars.
by Nick Turse
Published: Sep. 05, 2011 – AlterNet
Chances are, if you’ve ever sent a package overnight, bought a PC or a can of soda, you’ve paid your hard-earned money to a major Pentagon contractor. While large defense corporations that make fighter jets and armored vehicles garner the most attention, tens of thousands of “civilian” companies, from multi-national corporations hawking toothpaste and shampoo to big oil behemoths and even local restaurants scattered across the United States, all supply the Pentagon with the necessities used to carry on day-to-day operations and wage America’s wars. And they’ve made a killing doing it since 9/11.
The “War On Terror” Is A $6 Trillion Racket, Exceeding The Total Cost Of World War II
Posted: July 19, 2011 Filed under: Economy, Imperial Power, War on Terror, World Hegemony, World War III | Tags: Contractors, Military Industrial Complex, Obama's Wars, Pentagon, US Military Spending 3 Commentsby David DeGraw
First Published: Jul. 06, 2011 – Amped Status Report
When Obama launched his re-election propaganda campaign to trick the American public into thinking that he intends to end the Af-Pak War, he said that the “War on Terror” has cost $1 trillion over the past decade. While that is a staggering amount of money, he was being deceitful once again.
As you may have heard, a newly released study by the Eisenhower Research Project at Brown University revealed that the cost of the War on Terror is significantly greater than Obama has said. The little passing coverage the study received in the mainstream press cited $3.7 trillion as the total cost, which was the most conservative estimate. The moderate estimate, which the mainstream media ignored, was $4.4 trillion. In addition, interest payments on these costs will most likely exceed $1 trillion, which brings the total cost up to at least $5.4 trillion. The report also states that the following costs are not even included in this total:
Liberals Willing to Trade Blood and Treasure for Oil Company Profits Under Obama
Posted: March 29, 2011 Filed under: Economy, Illegal Occupation, Imperial Power, World Hegemony | Tags: Libya, Media, Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, NATO, Neocons, Obama's Wars, Oil 15 Commentsby Eric Blair
Published: Mar. 28, 2011 – Activist Post
It’s perplexing to see a high level of support for the unprovoked bombing of Libya on so-called “progressive” websites.
There has been an endless stream of humanitarian propaganda flowing from these sites trying to convince average liberals that the “human thing to do” is to rain down tomahawk missiles with depleted uranium to bring freedom and democracy to an oppressed people.
Huffington Post ran a piece by Ed Schultz titled Why I Support President Obama’s Decision to Invade Libya where he described his reasoning as follows:
Naming Names: Your Real Government
Posted: March 23, 2011 Filed under: New World Order | Tags: 9/11, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Global Elite, International Banksters, International Crisis Group (ICG), Libya, Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, Neocons, Rockefeller, Royal Institute of International Affairs, United Nations, Zbigniew Brzezinski 14 CommentsWhen dark deeds unfold, point the finger in this direction.
by Tony Cartalucci
Published: Mar. 22, 2011 – Activist Post
This is your real government; they transcend elected administrations, they permeate every political party, and they are responsible for nearly every aspect of the average American and European’s way of life. When the “left” is carrying the torch for two “Neo-Con” wars, starting yet another based on the same lies, peddled by the same media outlets that told of Iraqi WMD’s, the world has no choice, beyond profound cognitive dissonance, but to realize something is wrong.
What’s wrong is a system completely controlled by a corporate-financier oligarchy with financial, media, and industrial empires that span the globe. If we do not change the fact that we are helplessly dependent on these corporations that regulate every aspect of our nation politically, and every aspect of our lives personally, nothing else will ever change.
The following list, however extensive, is by far not all-inclusive. However after these examples, a pattern should become self-evident with the same names and corporations being listed again and again. It should be self-evident to readers of how dangerously pervasive these corporations have become in our daily lives. Finally, it should be self-evident as to how necessary it is to excise these corporations from our lives, our communities, and ultimately our nations, with the utmost expediency.
6 Reasons To Start World War III If You Are A Globalist
Posted: March 21, 2011 Filed under: Civil Liberties, Economy, New World Order, Problem Reaction Solution, World Hegemony, World War III | Tags: Agenda 21, Codex Alimentarius, Depopulation Agenda, Global Elite, IMF, Military Industrial Complex, One World Government, Police State, Rockefeller, US Military Spending, World Bank, World Currency, Zbigniew Brzezinski 5 CommentsPublished: Nov. 28, 2010 – Activist Post
The average person can barely imagine why World War III would be anything but a civilization-ending event. And, yet, we have heard Neocons ramping up rhetoric that suggests a new world war would be a viable option to correct a dying dollar and economy. Or, perhaps it is simply a sound investment if you are a Globalist.
RAND Corporation documents point to a desire for total war abroad and at home. The recent reactivation of North and South Korea tensions could be a potential catalyst in an East-West World War scenario possibly involving nukes. However, the next World War doesn’t necessarily need to be a conflagration; it could be a steady, slow, coldly calculated design to plunge the globe into austerity and totalitarian control through regulations such as those proposed by Codex Alimentarius and Agenda 21.
So, if one puts on the thinking cap of a sociopath, one might find the following 6 reasons are perfect to start World War III, by nukes or by stealth, and further the agenda of world governance.
Memorial Day 2010: Corporations Profit from Permanent War
Posted: May 25, 2010 Filed under: Imperial Power, World Hegemony | Tags: Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, US Army 8 Commentsby Bill Quigley
Published: May 24, 2010 – Information Clearing House
US law officially proclaims Memorial Day “as a day of prayer for permanent peace.”
However, the US is much closer to permanent war than permanent peace. Corporations are profiting from wars and lobbying politicians for more. The US, and the rest of the world, cannot afford the rising personal and financial costs of permanent war.
The Threatening Dangers
Posted: March 15, 2010 Filed under: Global Warming?, Imperial Power, War Crimes, World Hegemony | Tags: Haiti, Military Industrial Complex, NATO, Nuclear Weapons, US Army 3 Commentsby Fidel Castro
Published: Mar. 13, 2010 – ZNet
It is not an ideological issue related to the definitive hope that a better world is, and should be, possible.
It is a known fact that the homo sapiens has existed for about 200 thousand years, which is no more than a tiny span of the time passed since the emergence of the first basic forms of life on our planet approximately three billion years ago.
The answers to the unfathomable mysteries of life and nature have fundamentally been religious. It would be senseless to pretend otherwise and I am convinced that it will forever be this way. The deeper science delves into the explanation of universe, space, time, matter and energy; the infinite galaxies and the theories of the origin of the constellations and the stars; the atoms and the fractions of them that made possible life and its briefness; the more questions man will have in search of ever more complex and difficult rationalizations.
US aid for Israel tied to arms sales: 75% of the aid must be used to buy military material made in the US
Posted: January 5, 2010 Filed under: Imperial Power | Tags: AIPAC, Israel, Military Industrial Complex, Obama's Wars, Pentagon, USA, Yemen 2 Commentsby Anne Davies
Published: Jan. 04, 2009 – Uruknet.info
WASHINGTON: Just before Christmas, the US President, Barack Obama, signed into law one of his country’s biggest aid pledges of the year. It was bound not for Africa or any of the many struggling countries on the World Bank’s list.
It was a deal for $US2.77 billion ($3 billion) to go to Israel in 2010 and a total of $US30 billion over the next decade.
Israel is bound by the agreement to use 75 per cent of the aid to buy military hardware made in the US: in the crisis-racked US economy, those military factories are critical to many towns.
Who Wants More War?
Posted: December 8, 2009 Filed under: Illegal Occupation, Imperial Power, World Hegemony | Tags: Bush Doctrine, Military Industrial Complex, Obama's Wars 1 Commentby Rep. Ron Paul
Published: Dec. 08, 2009 – Antiwar.com
If anyone still doubted that this administration’s foreign policy would bring any kind of change, this week’s debate on Afghanistan should remove all doubt. The president’s stated justifications for sending more troops to Afghanistan and escalating the war amount to little more than recycling all the false reasons we began the conflict. It is so discouraging to see this coming from our new leadership, when the people were hoping for peace. New polls show that 49 percent of the people favor minding our own business on the world stage, up from 30 percent in 2002. Perpetual war is not solving anything. Indeed continually seeking out monsters to destroy abroad only threatens our security here at home as international resentment against us builds. The people understand this and are becoming increasingly frustrated at not being heard by the decision-makers. The leaders say some things the people want to hear, but change never comes.
Why Obama’s Surge in Afghanistan?
Posted: December 2, 2009 Filed under: Illegal Occupation, Imperial Power | Tags: Afghanistan, Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, Obama's Wars 4 Commentsby Shamus Cooke
Published: Dec. 02, 2009 – Global Research
Tuesday’s announcement that President Obama will send an additional 30,000 soldiers to Afghanistan — while begging his foreign allies to send an extra 10,000 — will have dramatic effects throughout the American and world society.
The hope that Obama’s election would drastically change U.S. foreign policy has been destroyed. The effects of his troop surge will change the minds of millions of Americans, who, until this point, were giving Obama the benefit of the doubt.
Such moments in history are capable of instantly removing piles of dust from the collective eyeball — just as the bank bailouts did.
The World’s Least Powerful Man: The Obama Puppet
Posted: December 2, 2009 Filed under: Economy, Imperial Power, Israeli Apartheid, War Crimes, War on Terror | Tags: Afghanistan, AIPAC, Bush, Illegal Israeli Settlements, Iraq, Israel, Israeli Nuclear Program, Military Industrial Complex, Obama, Oil, Palestine, Pentagon, Tony Blair, USA, Wall Street 9 Commentsby Paul Craig Roberts
Published: Dec. 01, 2009 – Information Clearing House
It didn’t take the Israel Lobby very long to bring President Obama to heel regarding his prohibition against further illegal Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land. Obama discovered that a mere American president is powerless when confronted by the Israel Lobby and that the United States simply is not allowed a Middle East policy separate from Israel’s.
Obama also found out that he cannot change anything else either, if he ever intended to do so.
The military/security lobby has war and a domestic police state on its agenda, and a mere American president can’t do anything about it.
President Obama can order the Guantanamo torture chamber closed and kidnapping and rendition and torture to be halted, but no one carries out the order.
Essentially, Obama is irrelevant.
“Why we fight”: The Nature of Modern Imperialism
Posted: November 23, 2009 Filed under: Economy, Imperial Power, World Hegemony | Tags: Africa, British Army, Central Asia, China, Globalisation, IMF, Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, NATO, Oil, Pentagon, Russia, UK, United Nations, US Army, USA, World Bank 24 CommentsAggressive and exclusive military alliances like NATO should be disbanded
by Alan Mackinnon
First Published: Nov. 17, 2009 – Scottish Left Review
The world of war is today dominated by a single superpower. In military terms the United States sits astride the world like a giant Colossus. As a country with only five per cent of the world’s population it accounts for almost 50 per cent of global arms spending. Its 11 naval carrier fleets patrol every ocean and its 909 military bases are scattered strategically across every continent. No other country has reciprocal bases on US territory – it would be unthinkable and unconstitutional. It is 20 years since the end of the Cold War and the United States and its allies face no significant military threat today. Why then have we not had the hoped-for peace dividend? Why does the world’s most powerful nation continue to increase its military budget, now over $1.2 trillion a year in real terms? What threat is all this supposed to counter?
The Pentagon Budget: Largest Ever and Growing
Posted: November 20, 2009 Filed under: Economy, Imperial Power, World Hegemony | Tags: Military Industrial Complex, Multinational Corporations, Pentagon, US Army, USA 25 Commentsby Sara Flounders
First Published: Nov. 07, 2009 – International Action Center
On Oct. 28, President Barack Obama signed the 2010 Defense Authorization Act, the largest military budget in U.S. history.
It is not only the world’s largest military budget but is larger than the military expenditures of the whole rest of the world combined. And it is growing nonstop. The 2010 military budget–which doesn’t even cover many war-related expenditures–is listed as $680 billion. In 2009 it was $651 billion and in 2000 was $280 billion. It has more than doubled in 10 years.
Recent Comments