Obama’s War on the Internet: The Ministry of Truth

by Philip Giraldi
Published: Jul. 19, 2010 – Campaign for Liberty

The Ministry of Truth was how George Orwell described the mechanism used by government to control information in his seminal novel 1984. A recent trip to Europe has convinced me that the governments of the world have been rocked by the power of the internet and are seeking to gain control of it so that they will have a virtual monopoly on information that the public is able to access. In Italy, Germany, and Britain the anonymous internet that most Americans are still familiar with is slowly being modified. If one goes into an internet café it is now legally required in most countries in the European Union to present a government issued form of identification. When I used an internet connection at a Venice hotel, my passport was demanded as a precondition and the inner page, containing all my personal information, was scanned and a copy made for the Ministry of the Interior — which controls the police force. The copy is retained and linked to the transaction. For home computers, the IP address of the service used is similarly recorded for identification purposes. All records of each and every internet usage, to include credit information and keystrokes that register everything that is written or sent, is accessible to the government authorities on demand, not through the action of a court or an independent authority. That means that there is de facto no right to privacy and a government bureaucrat decides what can and cannot be “reviewed” by the authorities. Currently, the records are maintained for a period of six months but there is a drive to make the retention period even longer.

The excuses being given for the increasing government intervention into the internet are essentially two: first, that the anonymity of the internet has permitted criminal behavior, fraud, pornography, and libel. Second is the security argument, that managing the internet is an integral part of the “global war on terror” in that it is used by terrorists to plan their attacks requiring governments to control those who use it. The United States government takes the latter argument one step farther, claiming that the internet itself is a vulnerable “natural asset” that could be seized or damaged by terrorists and must be protected, making the case for a massive $100 billion program of cyberwarfare. Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) argues that “violent Islamist extremists” rely on the internet to communicate and recruit and he has introduced a bill in the Senate that will empower the president to “kill” the internet in case of a national emergency.

But all of the arguments for intervention are essentially themselves fraudulent and are in reality being exploited by those who favor big government and state control. The anonymity and low cost nature of the internet means that it can be used to express views that are unpopular or unconventional, which is its strength. It is sometimes used for criminal behavior because it is a mechanism, not because there is something intrinsic in it that makes it a choice of wrongdoers. Before it existed, fraud was carried out through the postal service and over the telephone. Pornography circulated freely by other means. As for the security argument, the tiny number of actual terrorists who use the internet do so because it is there and it is accessible. If it did not exist, they would find other ways to communicate, just as they did in pre-internet days. In fact, intelligence sources report that internet use by terrorists is rare because of persistent government monitoring of the websites.

The real reason for controlling the internet is to restrict access to information, something every government seeks to do. If the American Departments of Defense and Homeland Security and Senator Lieberman have their way, new cybersecurity laws will enable Obama’s administration to take control of the internet in the event of a national crisis. How that national crisis might be defined would be up to the White House but there have been some precedents that suggest that the response would hardly be respectful of the Bill of Rights. Many countries already monitor and censor the internet on a regular basis, forbidding access to numerous sites that they consider to be subversive or immoral. During recent unrest, the governments of both Iran and China effectively shut down the internet by taking control of or blocking servers. Combined with switching off of cell phone transmitters, the steps proved effective in isolating dissidents. Could it happen here? Undoubtedly. Once the laws are in place a terrorist incident or something that could be plausibly described in those terms would be all that is needed to have government officials issue the order to bring the internet to a halt.

But the ability to control the internet technically is only part of the story. Laws are being passed that criminalize expressing one’s views on the internet, including both “hate crime” legislation and broadly drafted laws that make it a crime to support what the government describes loosely as terrorism in any way shape or form. Regular extra-legal government intrusion in the private lives of citizens is already a reality, particularly in the so-called Western Democracies that have the necessary technology and tech-savvy manpower to tap phones and invade computers. In Europe, draconian anti-terrorism laws enable security agencies to monitor phone calls and e-mails, in many cases without any judicial oversight. In Britain, the monitoring includes access to detailed internet records that are available for inspection by no less that 653 government agencies, most of which have nothing whatsoever to do with security or intelligence, all without any judicial review. In the United States, the Pentagon recently sought an internet and news “instant response capability” which it dubbed the Office of Strategic Influence and it has also seeded a number of retired military analysts into the major news networks to provide a pro-government slant on the war news. The State Department is also in the game, tasking young officers to engage presumed radicals in debate on their websites while the growing use of national security letters means that private communications sent through the internet can be accessed by Federal law enforcement agencies. The Patriot Act created national security letter does not require judicial oversight. More than 35,000 were issued by the FBI last year and the recipient of a letter commits a felony if he or she reveals the receipt of the document. In a recent case involving an internet provider in Philadelphia, a national security letter demanded all details of internet messages sent on a certain date, to include account information on clients with social security numbers and credit card references.

The danger is real. Most Americans who are critical of the actions of their own government rely on the internet for information that is uncensored and often provocative, including sites like Campaign for Liberty. As this article was being written, a story broke reporting that WordPress host Blogetery had been shut down by United States authorities along with all 73,000 Blogetery-hosted blogs. The company’s ISP is claiming that it had to terminate Blogetery’s account immediately after being ordered to do so by law enforcement officials “due to material hosted on the server.” The extreme response implies a possible presumed terrorist connection, but it is important to note that no one was charged with any actual offense, revealing that the government can close down sites based only on suspicion. It is also likely only a matter of time before Obama’s internet warfare teams surface either at the Defense Department or at State. Deliberately overloading and attacking the internet to damage its credibility, witness the numerous sites that have been “hacked” and have had to cease or restrict their activities. But the moves afoot to create a legal framework to completely shut the internet down and thereby control the “message” are far more dangerous. American citizens who are concerned about maintaining their few remaining liberties should sound the alarm and tell the politicians that we don’t need more government abridgement of our First Amendment rights.

Source: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1020

 

Related:

73,000 WordPress blogs shut down by U.S. Government

Internet Under Siege

Internet Anonymity: A Right of the Past?

The Surveillance Society: Trading Freedom For The Illusion Of Safety (With Videos)

Big Brother is watching you on Facebook & MySpace

VIDEO – Google’s Master Plan!

Google’s Deep CIA Connections

VIDEO – FACEBOOK: Federal Human Data Mining Program

DOCUMENTARY – Suspect Nation

VIDEO – The Big Brother State

DOCUMENTARY – The Real Big Brother


5 Comments on “Obama’s War on the Internet: The Ministry of Truth”

  1. Annie Ladysmith says:

    That Zionist-Jew Lieberman can go ^*%k himself!
    He is not a senator, he is a ‘poli-sci’ cartoon, unfortunately as dangerous as Hitler himself, there is no end to the mischief these common thugs cause the rest of us.

    Listen, we are aware of what’s coming, if you have something to say, say it now. We are seeing more clearly everyday, and the days of 9/11 false flags are over, we know who the real terrorists are and they are as predictable as all the petty tyrants before them.

    There will be places of refuge, were safety can be found for a time, if you refuse the mark you will find these places, there is no-one to fear except the great and living El Shaddai. Never take their mark.

  2. Dwight Baker says:

    Lost in lust, running from the meaning of life
    Many fall and die in their prime
    But are they dead?
    Some continue to live among the Predator Beast
    And yes they are dead worshiping the dead!
    By Dwight Baker
    July 20, 2010
    Dbaker007@stx.rr.com

    Harsh consequences for doing the wrong thing in America has been pushed down to just a thing that some run from and some don’t. All around the East Coast Blue Bloods we will find possibly millions that snub up their nose when any one comes along and points a finger of accusation against them.

    They are above all rules of law. They stay high on the lust of life and could care less if anyone got the final axe blow across their neck for anything they had a hand in doing. The high nightlife of decadence and perverted spoiled privilege is theirs for a brief time and they are going to run after it as hard as they can. Now who among our lawmakers are going to bring an end to such crimes, none that I know of?

    WHY? That is just the world order is set up today and yes it can be changed quickly and will be as soon as the base starves a bit then they like many more will begin to understand what is what and what is not.

    The lights in their brains will see then that they are ‘a what not’. A little cog in the wheel going slow now and slower later finally to be just as a pig in the poke way down in the pasture for none to see or even know exist.

  3. […] Obama’s War on the Internet: The Ministry of Truth […]

  4. […] Obama’s War on the Internet: The Ministry of Truth […]

  5. […] Obama’s War on the Internet: The Ministry of Truth […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s